Content Agents

Measure where AI cites your brand per market, per engine, per source.

The measurement layer of your AEO strategy — and it does two things scheduled-prompt trackers cannot: it checks real ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude answers geo-pinned to each country you sell in, and it breaks down exactly which domains those engines cite. Plus citation gaps, weekly signals, and bot crawl analytics, with Write to displace actions that link every gap to article creation.

Every query your prospects ask AI — in every market you sell in.

Map which queries you own and which you lose, country by country, and see the exact list of domains AI cites instead of you. GEO optimizes your articles — AEO measures whether AI answers cite your brand, and where.

What it looks at

Scheduled-prompt trackers vs Content Agents

A scheduled-prompt tracker

Content Agents AI Visibility

How it works

  1. Audit — Run reachability check and pick 5–10 commercial queries per market.
  2. Measure — Vacuum checks reveal where competitors dominate AI answers.
  3. Write — Write to displace opens article creation with the gap query.
  4. Re-check — Re-run checks after publish; track signals in Brand Cockpit.

Get cited. Not ignored.

Pair AEO visibility with GEO scoring for the full optimize-measure loop. Start with a reachability audit and your first vacuum check — free.

Frequently asked questions

How is AEO different from GEO?

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) scores your article before publish — structure, entities, citation readiness. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) measures whether your brand appears in AI answers after publish. Use GEO when drafting; use this workspace to verify results and find new gaps. See the AEO hub for the full glossary.

How is this different from tracking Google rankings?

Google rankings tell you where you appear in blue links. AEO tells you whether you appear in the answer itself — the paragraph a prospect reads when they ask ChatGPT "what is the best [your category]." Those are different signals. You can rank on page one and still be invisible in AI answers.

How is this different from monitoring-only AEO tools?

Two things scheduled-prompt trackers do not do. First, per-market tracking: they run one blended global check, while Content Agents geo-pins every query to each country you sell in, so a US win never hides a European gap. Second, the cited-domains breakdown: every check returns the ranked list of sources each engine cited, with share of voice over time. Then Write to displace links every gap to article production — you measure and ship the fix in one platform, not by exporting a dashboard to a separate CMS.

Can I really track AI visibility by country?

Yes. AI answers differ by market — ChatGPT will recommend different brands to a buyer in New York than to one in London. Content Agents runs each tracked query geo-pinned to your target markets against real ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude, and scores brand prominence per market. You see where you lead and where you are invisible, country by country.

What does the cited-domains breakdown show me?

For every query, the ranked list of domains each engine cited when it answered — competitor blogs, Reddit threads, review sites, documentation — with share of voice tracked over time. That tells you which sources AI trusts for your topics so you can reverse-engineer what makes them citable and displace them with your own GEO-optimized article.

Can I track where competitors appear?

Yes. Every vacuum check returns the full analysis — competitors cited, their prominence score, and the sources backing them, per market. Reverse-engineer competitor URLs to see what makes their content citable, then displace with your own GEO-optimized article.

What is llms.txt and why does the audit check for it?

llms.txt is an emerging standard that signals to language models what your site covers and how to credit you. Content Agents serves it on your domain automatically. Combined with robots.txt and sitemap access, it is one of the fastest AEO infrastructure wins.