Content Agents

Stop checking rival blogs by hand. Put a radar on them.

Register competitor domains once. Their content is crawled and tagged automatically, mapped against your own coverage, and turned into counter-content ideas — one click from feed to editorial calendar.

The whole landscape.

Competitor Intelligence is a continuous monitoring pipeline, not a one-time audit. It keeps watching so your team can keep publishing.

What it looks at

Manual rival-watching vs. a competitive radar.

The manual routine

Competitor Intelligence

How it works

  1. Add a domain — Enter a competitor root domain. Sitemap and RSS feed are discovered automatically — or paste a direct sitemap URL for stubborn sites.
  2. Sync and tag — Articles are imported and run through AI passes: theme tagging, category assignment, and a per-article insight brief.
  3. Act on the gaps — Read the radar, open a brief, and click to create a counter-content idea — it lands in your content plans, ready to draft.

Included in every plan.

Competitor Intelligence is part of the cockpit, not a premium bolt-on. Track your rivals from day one on any workspace.

Know their next move.

Add your first competitor domain and watch the radar fill in — then publish into the gaps.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from an SEO tool that shows competitor keywords?

Keyword tools show you which queries a domain ranks for — a data export you still have to interpret. Competitor Intelligence works at the content level: it imports the actual articles, tags them by theme and category, maps them against your own published coverage, and writes a differentiation brief for each one. The output is not a keyword list; it is an editorial move — often one click from becoming an item in your content plans.

How long does setup take?

Minutes. Add a competitor by entering its root domain — the sitemap and RSS feed are discovered automatically — then trigger the first sync. After the initial import, AI tagging and categorisation run on their own, and subsequent syncs happen automatically on a recurring schedule.

Does the AI decide what we publish in response?

No. The pipeline surfaces intelligence — the feed, the radar, the coverage map, the briefs. Acting on it is always a human choice: you decide which gap matters, which brief to hand a writer, and which competitor item deserves a counter. The one-click idea creation puts the item in your content plans as a suggestion, not on your site.

What is the return compared to doing this manually?

Manual competitor monitoring has two costs: the hours spent checking rival sites, and the misses — the pieces you never saw and the gaps you never noticed. Automating the sync removes the first; the radar and coverage map remove the second. Your editorial calendar gets steered by an actual picture of the landscape instead of whoever happened to browse a rival blog last week.

Who is this built for?

Marketers and content leads in contested categories — anywhere several publications chase the same audience. If part of someone’s week currently goes to skimming rival blogs and press pages, this replaces that routine with a feed, and replaces the "we should respond to this" Slack message with a counter idea already sitting in the content plan.