Content Agents

Your Editor-in-Chief, on your computer.

One teammate that senses, decides, and ships. Watch and steer it from the desk. When the tab is closed, the same Editor-in-Chief keeps going on your Mac — Propose by default, Act when you trust it.

One teammate.

Editor-in-Chief is not a chatbot and not a mute pair of hands. It is the CMO loop — sense, diagnose, act or propose, learn — plus the computer that finishes the work.

What it looks at

A chat assistant answers. An editor-in-chief acts.

Generic AI chat

Editor-in-Chief

How it works

  1. Meet it on the desk — Editor-in-Chief is the home: status of the Mac Bot, what needs your call, what already shipped. Brief it from the sidebar on any page.
  2. Start on Propose — It drafts, queues, and waits. You Approve, Edit, or Dismiss. Nothing consequential leaves until you say so.
  3. Turn on Act when it has earned it — The same teammate writes, publishes, comments, and uploads on its own — still paused for login walls and spend. Pause is always one click.

Included in every plan.

Editor-in-Chief is the product. The desk is the window. The Mac Bot is where it lives when you close the tab. Every workspace gets the desk, the chat, and Propose vs Act.

Meet your Editor-in-Chief.

Open the desk, pair a Mac if you want it working with the tab closed, and start on Propose.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from pasting my article into a chatbot?

A chatbot sees only what you paste and can only answer in text. Editor-in-Chief is wired into your workspace: it reads your brand voice, content plans, and article metadata automatically, and it acts through real tools — scoring the article, drafting the social post, scheduling the newsletter, changing the theme. The output is not advice you have to go execute; it is executed work you approve.

What does setup look like?

There is none beyond opening Editor-in-Chief. Pair a Mac if you want it working with the tab closed. Start on Propose; turn on Act per domain when the output has earned it.

Will it change my article without asking?

On Propose, nothing consequential leaves until you Approve. Editorial review of a single article never writes the body unless you apply a suggestion. Act is the named switch for domains you have already trusted — login walls and spend still pause.

Where is the return on investment?

Two places. First, quality: every article gets a structured senior-editorial pass before publish, so weak spots are caught while you can still fix them — not after the piece underperforms. Second, time: the tasks that normally mean five different screens — review, social draft, scheduling, enrichment, theme tweaks — collapse into one conversation.

Who gets the most out of this?

Teams publishing at volume without a dedicated managing editor. If articles ship with inconsistent depth, drifting voice, or no structured review because nobody has time to give one, Editor-in-Chief becomes the constant: every piece gets the same seven-dimension scrutiny, and every editor gets the same senior second opinion.