Content Agents

Every newsroom has a chief editor. Now yours does too.

A conversational AI editor that lives inside your article editor — it reviews every piece against seven editorial dimensions, then acts: plans, schedules, enriches, and redesigns, with you approving every change.

One editor.

Editor-in-Chief is not another chatbot bolted onto a CMS. It is an agent wired into every part of the platform — reviewing, planning, distributing, and designing from a single conversation.

What it looks at

A chat assistant answers. An editor-in-chief acts.

Generic AI chat

Editor-in-Chief

How it works

  1. Ask, in plain language — "Review this article", "schedule a social post for it", "make the theme warmer" — one chat panel in the editor sidebar handles all of it.
  2. It works with real tools — The agent picks the right tools for the job — editorial assessment, SERP research, enrichment, theme generation — and runs them against your actual workspace.
  3. You approve, it applies — Results come back as suggestion cards and previews. Nothing changes your article or your site until you click Apply.

Included in every plan.

Editor-in-Chief is the heart of the editor, not an add-on. Every workspace gets the full agent — review, actions, design mode, and product help.

Give every article a chief editor.

Open any draft, ask for a review, and watch it come back with scores, suggestions, and one-click actions.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from pasting my article into a chatbot?

A chatbot sees only what you paste and can only answer in text. Editor-in-Chief is wired into your workspace: it reads your brand voice, content plans, and article metadata automatically, and it acts through real tools — scoring the article, drafting the social post, scheduling the newsletter, changing the theme. The output is not advice you have to go execute; it is executed work you approve.

What does setup look like?

There is none. Editor-in-Chief lives in the article editor sidebar for every workspace. The one thing worth doing first is filling in your brand voice settings — the review benchmarks against your voice profile, so a complete profile means sharper, more specific feedback.

Will it change my article without asking?

No. The editorial review only reads and scores — it never writes to your article body. Suggestions arrive as cards with explicit Apply and Cancel buttons, and design changes are previewed before you activate them. Human-in-the-loop is the design, not a setting.

Where is the return on investment?

Two places. First, quality: every article gets a structured senior-editorial pass before publish, so weak spots are caught while you can still fix them — not after the piece underperforms. Second, time: the tasks that normally mean five different screens — review, social draft, scheduling, enrichment, theme tweaks — collapse into one conversation.

Who gets the most out of this?

Teams publishing at volume without a dedicated managing editor. If articles ship with inconsistent depth, drifting voice, or no structured review because nobody has time to give one, Editor-in-Chief becomes the constant: every piece gets the same seven-dimension scrutiny, and every editor gets the same senior second opinion.